🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing group of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," said the parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, action is largely unfolding at the regional level amid national stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding parental consent for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain figures to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, further countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers show that governments around the world are no longer content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.